OMG, this is so ridiculous. I've got Alzheimer's patient attorneys sending me crazy blackmail Motion to Quash letter threats along with extraneous materials such as a wife's check. That's right, Joseph F. Hart, attorney at law as I've written about previously, the guy with the under construction sign on his law firm site for the past few months, has sent me a bunch of stuff in the mail. Apparently having no legal secretary to help, he has erred in an embarrassing way.
I've been told his Motion to Quash he's filing for a March 5th hearing is "retarded" since I haven't filed a Motion to Compel and won't be filing one since I now have the master email account address to use as a starting point. So basically the Motion is just a way to get easy money out of a dumb party who hired him to try and hide his identity.
This is what attorneys do, they manipulate people's weaknesses and lack of legal knowledge to get as much money out of them as possible. A Motion to Quash is going to cost this guy thousands of dollars!
Hart just sent me an email wanting me to return the check. I wrote him back who he thinks I am, his legal secretary? He doesn't really need a Hart check, but his Hart checked!
Geez, I sent someone to file a small claims court case on my behalf in another county and she came back with my birthday as the date I have to go present my case. It's not fair!
These attorneys are such scum sucking criminals. They're greedy and will keep your entire retainer if you let them. They'll concoct ways to get to your retainer even when they never represent you!
What sleaze! I did all the work, the attorney didn't even represent me in court and she took $2,500 of my money.
So, for my 50th B-day I'll be spending it in Contra Costa County before a Judge pleading my case against a sleazy greedy she devil lawyer.
I've been waiting for electronic paper a while now. The LiveScibe Pen system appears to be the closest thing to it for now. I'm very busy but I thought I'd drop this information into a quick blog post. This pen is packed full of innovation. Check it out.
Livescribe
He's had an "under construction" sign on his website now for the past two months. So who is Joeseph F. Hart? Why he's none other then the former partner of Donaldson and Hart, where he worked for 7 years. The firm's name has since changed, having dropped Hart, and is now called "Donaldson & Calif". Michael C. Donaldson is the owner who apparently had a fallout with Hart.
Mr. Hart's now on the verge of apparent retirement with the kind of self esteem exemplified in having a construction sign on one's law firm practice site for the past few months. He has an entire 14 connections on LinkedIn after his life long career as an attorney. Apparently an attorney at law who would much prefer to be on the golf course, I can confirm Mr. Hart sends blackmail threats to those who refuse to withdraw their subpoenas for AOL and Google account information.
This attorney Joeseph F. Hart has been involved representing a client who has had the accounts "EWollmann@aol.com" and the YouTube account "JazzLover07". I lawfully subpoenaed the account holder info way back in September 2009. Both account holders are the same person. Since a couple days ago Mr. Hart has been sending me multiple emails with threats essentially blackmailing me in an attempt to prevent me from obtaining account information. Mr. Hart is essentially using the same tactics the cyberstalker has been using against me.
Here's an example among one of four letters I've received the past few days:
Blackmail is the crime of threatening to reveal embarrassing, disgraceful or damaging information about a person to the public, family, spouse or associates unless money is paid to purchase silence. It is a form of extortion.
Blackmail has been defined in the broad sense to mean "compelling someone to act against their will or gaining or attempting to gain something of value." Courts vary on interpreting what "something of value" includes, but it is not necessarily a money payment in all cases.Mr. Hart is a former graduate of the UCLA School of Law and UC Berkeley and specializes in business and entertainment law. Mr. Hart is also the President of Rancho Park Golf Club.
So one afternoon in October, 2009 I'm walking up the street from the store to my apartment. I happen to have a sore ankle because I wore the wrong tennis shoes on the treadmill at the gym. I note a 30's something short blond haired woman walking towards me with a gigantic mean looking unleashed dog trailing 4 feet behind her. When bipedal, I imagine the dog would be taller than myself, that's how large it was, and quite muscular unlike the poor similar critter shown here.
As the lady approaches with her dog following behind, I begin to slightly freak out and say something really polite like, "you should get that big dog on a leash!" My fear in having to pass an extremely large unleashed dog accelerates as I know I'm in a vulnerable position where in a split second the dog could possibly maul me to death.
As the dog passes, I note it has taken notice of the exchange of words I had with its owner. I feel a rush of panic as the dog stares at, then begins lunging after me. I raise my voice in panic asking the owner to call her dog off and she has to grab it to prevent an attack. As she struggles to control the dog it's obviously riled up trying to squirm away to come after me again.
A few moments after they begin heading down the street I express my displeasure over being placed in such vulnerable life threatening position with, "your dog is a lethal weapon and you need to get it on a leash!" Once again, the dog reverses its path and starts towards me again, coming as close as 3 feet. On its owner's 
command the dog quickly reverses itself on a dime demonstrating this time that it's really a well trained attack dog.
So what do you think the lady would say to me after it's all said and done? Does she apologize since she had her dog unleashed? Nooooo! What this lady says after bringing a few moments of terror into my life was "You're just jealous!" By the time she uttered such ridiculous mind blowing cruel words, she was way down the street at which time I pointed at her and said "you're in big trouble! You're dog's a lethal weapon!!!"
After it was all over did I think about calling the police? It did cross my mind. What prevented me from calling the SFPD is how utterly useless they are. They must be the worst cops in the entire country from my experience. SFPD cops seem to be on the side of the criminals in many respects. After all, without criminals, or the politicians who need limo motorcycle cops, they'd be unemployed. I didn't know if this lady lived in my neighborhood or how I could possibly locate her to file assault charges. Yes, assault charges. I was scared for my life. Visions of my being mauled to death by a big black dog seemed very possible.
Turns out someone had witnessed the little tiff, the street watchman who often stands out on the building patio checking out the neighborhood. I spoke with him shortly after the incident and he said he recalled another incident where the big mean dog lunged and nearly attacked someone. The victim was yelling and scared to death. The watchman said he knew where the lady lived and I found a couple who lived in the building who gave me a heads up to her unit number.
Anyway, back to my dog story. After the lady departed around the corner with her dog, I was still reeling from the encounter. I told everyone I bumped into about it, "this lady with a huge big black unleashed dog nearly attacked me with her dog and then said 'you're just jealous'!! People were truly appalled.
described how the Asian males had to run inside Geary Street in order to seek protection from . . . and her attacking dog, and that . . .and another had to to seek protection from . . . . .and her dog from entering that building. After . . . . turned away and walked away from the door, . . . went outside. But . . . turned the dog to face . . . shouting "It doesn't matter if your black, Asian or White" and sicced the dog on . . . .. The dog bit . . . in the left hand injuring him.
.........was arrested on July 19, 2002 because her dog allegedly bit a man. She was taken to County Jail 9 where she was booked and instructed to disrobe in the presence of a male officer. When she refused, male and female deputies dragged her into a safety cell, forcibly removed her clothing and left her naked in the cell for approximately 12 hours. First Amended Class Action Complaint, at ¶ 20. She was awakened every 20 minutes by pounding on the door by a male officer who observed her naked.Yes, the same lady who sued the City of San Francisco in 2004 under a Class Action lawsuit nearly attacked me with her big black unleashed dog, then uttered the kind words "you're just jealous!" The community's at risk as long as this lady continues to disobey leash laws with that kind of attitude. Imagine if a little kid was walking past this dog and made a wrong move.
I've been waiting a long time for electric cars to appear since the mid-1980's because I can't stand the smell of gasoline nor the continual rise of the price per gallon. Other more futurist visionaries have even been waiting for flying cars! Apparently, even flying cars are a strong possibility on the horizon.
When I was a kid in the 1960's I remember being shocked at witnessing a car drive into the lake at Lake Tahoe California. They had driven their amphibian convertible into the water that then became a mini boat! I couldn't believe what I had witnessed at the time. How much fun would that be to take a 
nice scenic drive at Lake Tahoe then into the lake for a boat ride.
I'm continually getting jolts of culture shock from the fabulous new technologies that have appeared recently. One of my favorites is Sirius Satellite voice activated radio. Though I don't own the technology yet, I've seen it advertised where a driver of a vehicle simply states what they'd like to hear and the song plays instantaneously! The other feature I've noted in satellite radio is the digital display of the artists name, song title and perhaps year the song was released.
These new music distribution systems are all mind bo
ggeling for those of us who grew up with turntable record players, not to mention commercial radio. It's too bad people couldn't have all this fabulous technology back in the 60's when there was a lot more talent and quality music producers. If you really think about it, it's truly amazing how far technology has come within our lifetimes. Why, back when I was in high school in the 70's, they didn't even have VCR's, ATM's or fax machines yet!
Then of course, there are the truly revolutionary Star Trek like beam me up flip cell phones! I had a briefcase model mobile phone way back in the 1980's
when I was selling young technology. Back then there were very few cell base locations for the transmitters to signal to and calls were commonly dropped. It wasn't until the mid-1990's that the cell phone technology finally took off. I was one of the few in the 90's to have my own Sprint Cell phone, but it wasn't a flip phone because they hadn't developed to that level yet. Then, I rebelled a while from the cell phone craze until I was forced to get my first flip phone for business needs. I've grown into the technology and use my cell phone quite frequently now. I don't know what I'd do without the convenience of my phone and I'm sure others feel the same way.
Getting back to the topic of cars, I am certain we all could have been driving electric cars by now had the oil and car companies not deliberately stunted the industry. Why, we could have even had solar powered cars by now, or cars that run on other kinds of fuels. As for the potential arrival of flying cars, I honestly don't believe there will ever be a mass market appeal to such dangerous small vehicles.
I was at the court clerk's office today and a nice attorney was standing in line I managed to get some interesting information from. First, he was in pro per because he injured himself at a hotel in Taiwan a year ago. He was on a little push scooter because his foot was injured very seriously and still healing after a year.
What the attorney told me was it is extremely rare that courts ever award a prevailing party the other party's attorney fees. He says it is something the courts just don't do. I mentioned how strange that was since such a threat is always used to prevent frivolous lawsuits from occurring. He said it's a total fallacy. What this means is sue happy people can sue to their heart's content and never be charged another's attorney's fees if they lose. Wow!
There's some strange man who is under the illusion he can possibly get his attorneys fees awarded should some miracle occur and he get his case dismissed or win at trial. Fat chance.
